![]() And as I have recently showed empirically, in both the law and the public’s eye, gay sex with preventive measures against HIV is still deemed more dangerous than unprotected heterosexual sex is. Hodges, lawyers went to great lengths to desexualize same sex relationships, making them easier for the court to swallow. When presenting the court with the marriage equality cases, United States v. As a few scholars pointed out, the Court seems to ignore the possibility that it was simply a hook-up, which nevertheless deserves as much protection as consensual sex in a committed relationship does. Texas, the Supreme Court constructed a narrative of a deep emotional bond between the couple at the heart of the case when in reality, the couple was not in a longstanding romantic relationship. Even when striking down the Texas sodomy law and expanding constitutional protection to same-sex, nonmarital sexual relations in Lawrence v. Courts and legislators often manage simultaneously to ignore the realities of gay sexual expression, on the one hand, yet treat it differently from heterosexual sex on the other. ![]() The law has a strange relationship with gay sex.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |